George Castle
c. 1840–1885
Derrick's great-great-grandfather. An agricultural labourer who was widowed within a year and took his baby son to his dead wife's parents.
Family
Each person is marked by where that line came from, in words as well as colour.
On the individual lines:
- Martha Giddings (spouse): index and census
What the record says
Documented The 1871 census names him as son-in-law and father; his death is an index entry matched by name, age and district.
Born c.1840, Baldock · died Q4 1885, Hitchin, aged 46 (an index entry matched by name, age and district)
| When | What | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| c.1840 | Born at Baldock | The 1871 census gives age 30 and Baldock. | Documented |
| Q3 1862 | Marries a Giddins | Registered at Hitchin. The index puts a Castle and a Giddins on the same page; the 1871 census relationship is what ties them. | Read with care |
| Q4 1862 | A son | George William, registered at Hitchin, within three months of the wedding. | Documented |
| Q3 1863 | Widowed | Martha dies, nine to twelve months after the birth. It was not childbirth. | Documented |
| 1871 | Son-in-law at Norton End | Aged 30, an agricultural labourer, in the house of James and Elizabeth Giddins, with his son George aged 8 (RG10 piece 1365, folio 27). | Documented |
| Q4 1885 | Dies at Hitchin | Aged 46, registered at Hitchin, vol 3a p249: the only George Castle death at Hitchin between 1884 and 1886, and the age fits a man born about 1839 to 1840. A tree had said 'died when his son was 23', which agrees. Matched by name, age and district; the certificate has not been read. | Read with care |
Where this comes from
Each line of the table above names the record it rests on in its third column, and the grade at the top says how well the whole is evidenced. What is not established is said under its own heading below. How the grades and the labels on the chart are decided, and every source this archive holds.
What is not established
- His own parents are not known.
- His death certificate has not been read, so the entry above is matched and not proved.